 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mishima v. Holiday Mart, Inc., NO. 24888,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board properly denied summary judgment to an employee in her claim seeking benefits for her back pain and mental illness as her employer was only to pay under the settlement terms for such costs, as per Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-21, related to her prior compensable injury, and not for correlative maladies.
|
|||||
| State v. Mikasa, NO. 25776, NO. 25777, NO. 25778,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bankers Trust Co. v. Blanco, NO. 26146,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a property owner's challenge to a title insurance company's foreclosure action, the company was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law as the owner failed to satisfy his burden with specific facts showing that there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the company's alleged unverified and unauthenticated exhibits.
|
|||||
| State v. Medeiros, NO. 26959,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for burglary in the first degree was affirmed because the trial court did not err in qualifying the fingerprint technician as an expert, allowing the questioning of the expert regarding her qualifications to be heard by the jury, and in admitting fingerprint exhibits.
|
|||||
| State v. Starley, NO. 24885,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of abuse of a family or household member since any error in the jury instructions did not adversely affect defendant's substantial rights, the prosecution properly elected the culpable act for which a unanimous verdict was required, and defendant failed to preserve evidentiary issues for appeal.
|
|||||
| Aames Capital Corp. v. Hernando, NO. 26706,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Flournoy v. State, NO. 27267,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Petran v. Kaluna, NO. 27754,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
