Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Hawaii - May 16, 2006
	Caneda v. Okuyama, NO. 25070, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 16, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Plaintiff's motor vehicle tort claim was barred by applicable two-year limitations period set forth in Haw. Rev. Stat. § 431:10C-315(b). Private health insurance benefits received by plaintiff after motor vehicle accident at issue did not qualify as "public assistance benefits" under plain and unambiguous language of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 431:10C-103. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In the Interest of A.B., NO. 27113, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 16, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Decisions by a family court awarding permanent custody of a mother's first child were affirmed because, inter alia, the mother subjected the child to physical neglect, abandonment, and threatened harm, and the child had a history of wandering from the family home. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	In the Interest of Doe, NO. 27135, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 16, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: A family court's order awarding permanent custody of a father's minor child was affirmed because the father's fiance's sister did not meet the definition of a family member as was stated in Haw. Rev. Stat. § 587-2 (2005) by being a person responsible for the child's care. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.