 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kurpis v. Kurpis, NO. 27092,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided , May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Family court's orders in an action relating to child custody, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 571-46, were affirmed, except that part of one finding of fact was vacated; the family court seemed to equalize two parents and locations, then preserve its perception of status quo, but this equalization was not an abuse of discretion.
|
|||||
| Kurpis v. Kurpis, NO. 27092,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided , May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mattos v. Aloha Hyundai, Ltd., NO. 27071,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court's order denying an automobile dealership's motion to compel arbitration was affirmed because the customers signed two separate agreements, and their agreement to arbitrate disputes arising from one of those agreements did not automatically connote an agreement to arbitrate disputes arising from the other agreement.
|
|||||
| State v. Dutro, NO. 27016,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions for racketeering under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 842-2(3), promoting gambling under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1221(1)(a), and cruelty to animals in violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 711-1109(1), 705-500 were vacated because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to interview witnesses and/or a conflict of interest.
|
|||||
| State v. Vierra, NO. 26624,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not entitled to reversal of conviction for second-degree assault under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-711(1)(a) because there was substantial evidence that defendant caused the complaining witness to suffer a nasal bone fracture, which constituted a "substantial bodily injury" as that term was defined in Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-700.
|
|||||
| Ucko v. Robbins, NO. 26485,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Haw. Rev. Stat. § 514A-89 was not applicable to the installation of atrium enclosures in condominium units because the condominium association board, not condominium owners, selected the contractors, coordinated and supervised the construction and installation of the atrium enclosures, and disbursed payments to the contractors.
|
|||||
| Underwood v. Colley, NO. 26843,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided , May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Underwood v. Colley, NO. 26843,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 17, 2006, Decided , May 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Amendment of New Mexico spousal support award was vacated because New Mexico had continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the spousal support order and because Hawaii lacked continuing, exclusive jurisdiction over New Mexico's spousal support order, it could not serve as a responding tribunal to modify New Mexico's spousal support order.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
