 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Jou v. Schmidt, NO. 26877,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Final judgment was upheld, where insured was precluded from relitigating issue of whether insurer was obligated to reimburse licensed physician/medical provider for physical therapy provided by third parties not licensed, but acting under provider's supervision, because same issue was already decided against him in summary disposition order.
|
|||||
| Keahole Def. Coalition, Inc. v. Bd. of Land & Natural Res., NO. 26305,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment vacating order which reversed Board's decision was upheld, where corporation lacked standing to challenge judgment and did not have due process right to contested case hearing, because its economic interest did not constitute "property" within meaning of federal and state constitutions.
|
|||||
| Tri-S Corp. v. W. World Ins. Co., NO. 26202,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 18, 2006, Decided , May 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In insurance coverage dispute, summary judgment and prejudgment interest were properly granted, where insurance policy contained severability-of-interests clause, and phrase "insured" in policy exclusion must be read to refer to insured seeking coverage as opposed to "named insured" or "any insured."
|
|||||
| Yoneda v. Tom, NO. 26271,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Claunch, NO. 26367,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 22, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court erred in concluding that a police department's general order establishing the authority and procedures at sobriety checkpoints was subject to the requirements of Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 91 as there was no reason to depart from judicial precedent establishing that such orders were exempt under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 91-1(4) (1993).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
