 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bugado v. State, NO. 26723,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In request for postconviction relief, pursuant to Haw. R. Penal P. 40, trial court properly denied petition because evidence petitioner alleged State should have disclosed dated to 1995, and it was irrelevant to petitioner's convictions for offenses arising in 2000; Haw. Rev. Stat. § 701-109 did not apply because actions were not continuous.
|
|||||
| Elizares v. State, NO. 26923,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court properly denied defendant's Haw. R. Penal P. 40 petition for postconviction relief because he waived various claims under R. 40(a)(3) by not raising them in prior appeal, and other claims were not colorable, so circuit court did not err by failing to grant defendant a hearing on them under R. 40(f).
|
|||||
| Gomez v. Am. Airlines, NO. 26914,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly granted where passenger's claim for compensation for accidental injury was barred by two-year personal injury statute of limitations, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 657-7.
|
|||||
| Haw. Providers Network, Inc. v. AIG Haw. Ins. Co., NO. 27345,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which an assignee alleged that insurers improperly made reduced payments for personal injury protection services, a previous judgment entered in favor of the insurers constituted a final judgment. All rights and liabilities and all claims of all parties had been terminated.
|
|||||
| State v. Perez, NO. 26270,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 23, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of first degree burglary, a violation of Haw. Rev. Stat. § 708-810(1)(c), because there was substantial circumstantial evidence that defendant had intent to commit crime against person or property rights when he entered neighbor's apartment and jury was entitled to reject testimony that he lacked requisite intent.
|
|||||
| Bereday v. Keehi Mem. Org., NO. 27672,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Hunt v. State, NO. 27014,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied petitioner's Haw. R. Penal P. 40 petition for postconviction relief where he failed to show that there were specific errors or omissions reflecting counsel's lack of skill, judgment, or diligence, and that such errors or omissions resulted in either withdrawal or substantial impairment of potentially meritorious defense.
|
|||||
| Peca v. Riedl, NO. 26172,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Winterborne v. State, NO. 27040,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 24, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order denying petitioner's second Haw. R. Penal P. 40 motion for postconviction relief was upheld where petitioner waived the issue of whether he entered his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily when he failed to raise the issue in his first postconviction motion and in his appeal of its denial.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
