 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Plotts v. Cawthon, NO. 27693,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Shipman v. State, NO. 27257,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The circuit court did not err in denying appellant's Haw. R. Penal P. 40 petition for postconviction relief without holding a hearing, where the record showed that appellant's allegations showed no colorable claim.
|
|||||
| State v. Ayres, NO. 25530,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Officers' testimonies that defendant was stopped on state roadway while operating motor vehicle without wearing seat belt constituted credible evidence of sufficient quality and probative value to enable reasonable person to find defendant guilty; thus, his conviction was upheld.
|
|||||
| State v. Honolulu Univ. of Arts, Sciences & Humanities, NO. 26755,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because university did not properly preserve its objections it now raised on appeal, and it improperly raised such objections for first time on reconsideration when it could have raised its objections earlier, university's contention with respect to admission of its complaints was without merit; thus, amended judgment was upheld.
|
|||||
| State v. Keliikoa, NO. 27445,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. S. Ev, NO. 26503,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Waimana Enters. v. Bd. of Land & Natural Res., No. 26559,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Cancellation of revocable water use permit and granting of long-term lease allowed light company to draw water from acquifer for industrial uses rendered appeal moot.
|
|||||
| Waimana Enters. v. Bd. of Land & Natural Res., No. 26519,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, May 25, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of a challenge to the board of natural resources' grant of a utility's request for a second extension of time to complete the construction of a power plant under a conservation district use permit was proper as the company lacked standing to file the appeal pursuant to Haw. Rev. Stat. § 91-14(a).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
