 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Gorai v. MTL, Inc., NO. 26903,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An order from the Hawaii Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board dismissing an employee's appeal of a decision denying his application to reopen a 1994 workers' compensation claim was upheld where the employee did not file his notice of appeal within the 20-day time limit required by Haw. Rev. Stat. § 386-87(a) (1993).
|
|||||
| Kalima v. Marks, NO. 28594,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, July 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Dilliner, NO. 27905,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred when it failed to inform the jury that it had to find that defendant intended or knew that his conduct was violating the TRO under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 586-4 because the jury could have convicted defendant without considering whether he actually knew that sleeping in a vehicle within 100 hundred yards of the residence violated the TRO.
|
|||||
| State v. McElroy, NO. 27986,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err under Haw. R. Evid. 702 in failing to strike expert testimony on the ground that the witness failed to consider several police reports, as the decision to consult one report instead of another, without a showing of how the reports differed or would have affected the testimony, could not sustain a reliability challenge.
|
|||||
| Young v. Ellis, NO. 28500,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 9, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal of order of dismissal in foreclosure action was dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction where dismissal order did not belong to any of categories of judgments that were appealable under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 667-51(a); trial court had not entered foreclosure decree, judgment confirming sale of foreclosed property, or deficiency judgment.
|
|||||
| State v. Farrow, NO. 28488,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Gomes, NOS. 27906 and 27907,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 11, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err in denying defendant's motions for judgment of acquittal on a bribery charge where viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, there was sufficient evidence that defendant offered a witness money with the intent to induce her to avoid legal process summoning her to testify.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
