 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Courbat v. Dahana Ranch, Inc., NO. 25151,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, July 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred in granting summary judgment to a ranch in a couple's deceptive business practice claim against it under Haw. Rev. Stat. ch. 480 because the materiality of the nondisclosure of the ranch's liability waiver requirement during negotiation of original tour contract was a genuine issue of material fact, resolvable only by the trier of fact.
|
|||||
| Hunt v. State, NO. 27014,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, July 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mizukami v. Mizukami, NOS. 26890, 26927, 26958,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, July 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Orpilla, NO. 27167,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 10, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence of drugs and drug-related paraphernalia obtained from his person as the result of a search incident to his arrest because the temporary investigative stop of defendant did not exceed the time permitted by law.
|
|||||
| In re McKeague, NO. 27567,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, July 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in denying petitioner's motion to permit filing of new litigation as required of vexatious litigants by Haw. Rev. Stat. § 634J-7 as, inter alia, his only demonstration of prejudice was alleged statement of court, "you've had a similar case like this before haven't you?" which was not a clear and precise demonstration of prejudice.
|
|||||
| State v. Davalos, NO. 27270,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 11, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
