 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blaisdell v. Dep't of Pub. Safety, NO. 27170,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where an inmate failed to pay the filing fee, the circuit court did not err in dismissing his suit against the Hawai'i Department of Public Safety concerning the garnishment of the inmate's prison earnings under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 353-22.5. The inmate's appeal lacked merit.
|
|||||
| Fistes v. Kobayashi, NO. 27848,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Izuo v. Dias, NO. 26160,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly awarded to sellers of property in their action against a buyer for breach of the sales agreement where the buyer failed to make the payments provided for in the agreement. The buyer failed to cure when given additional time by the trial court in an attempt to adhere to a "time is of the essence clause."
|
|||||
| Wong v. Cayetano, NO. 27117,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, July 26, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though circuit court erred by holding that plaintiffs' malicious prosecution action against defendants was barred by res judicata based on plaintiffs' prior federal action, the error was harmless because plaintiffs did not challenge conclusions of law that formed separate and independent bases for the circuit court's judgment.
|
|||||
| Rita v. State, NO. 27093,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Haw. R. Penal P. 40 was properly denied where petitioner's claims that trial counsel was ineffective were previously ruled upon or were waived. Petitioner also failed to show that his appellate counsel was ineffective.
|
|||||
| State v. Masaniai, NO. 26232,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, July 27, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel during his trial for extortion, even though his attorney failed to move for an examination to determine his fitness to proceed, pursuant to Haw. Rev. Stat. § 704-403 (1993), because it was within the discretion of defense counsel to decide whether to make that motion.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
