 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Haole v. State, NO. 27010,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Haw. Admin. R. § 19-41-7 did not impose duty on injured passenger's employer, driver, and contractor, to indemnify DOT in action arising from accident occurring at harbor because DOT's governing statutes did not authorize DOT to issue administrative rules exonerating the State from the negligence of its employees.
|
|||||
| Kekona v. Abastillas, NO. 24051,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Stoa, NO. 26272,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a speeding case, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291C-102, judicial notice of the laser speed measuring device was proper because an officer testified that he performed the required functionality tests, the device was functioning properly, he had a valid certification for operating the laser gun, and he had 20 years' experience in traffic enforcement duties.
|
|||||
| Tortorello v. Tortorello, NO. 27459,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re McKeague, NO. 27567,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In the Interest of A.M., NO. 27601,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Miller, NO. 27411,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An administrative judge did not abuse his discretion when he modified a prior order by changing date of defendant's trial where he had cogent reasons for his order: defendant's demand for a speedy trial under U.S. Const. amend. VI, Haw. Const. art. I, 14, and Haw. R. Penal P. 48, and the duty to comply with the speedy trial requirements of Rule 48.
|
|||||
| Sussman v. Sussman, NO. 27293,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court properly imputed future income to a husband by the expectancy of future gifts from his parents, Haw. Rev. Stat. § 580-47, because there was no dispute that during the marriage, the parents provided the husband and his family with a residence, paid some of their expenses, and provided them with the funds to pay their remaining expenses.
|
|||||
| in the Interest of B. Children, NO. 27936,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
