 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Grandinetti v. State, NO. 27721,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Singleton v. Liquor Comm'n, NO. 26898,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While state and county entities, as owners of real property, were owners for notice and protest purposes under Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 281-57 and 281-59, and liquor commission's counting entities' property for purposes of protest vote did not constitute rule-making; rather it was application of statute.
|
|||||
| Stanford Carr Dev. Corp. v. Unity House, Inc., NO. 26906,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Partial summary judgment was proper because the plain meaning of the language in the agreement encompassed appellants' claims, which arose from the note, the lender/borrower relationship created by the note, and matters closely related thereto. Therefore, the agreement was enforceable.
|
|||||
| State v. Meyers, NOS. 26574, 26580, 26586,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err by denying defendants' motions for judgment of acquittal on the first-degree assault charge because the evidence showed that the victim's eight fractured ribs resulted in protracted impairment of the function of his lungs and therefore the victim suffered serious bodily injury under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 707-700.
|
|||||
| Kemp v. State of Hawai'i Child Support Enforcement Agency, NO. 26084,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Class representative failed to meet requirement of Haw. R. Civ. P. Rule 23(a)(3) because claim against child support enforcement agency (CSEA) was based on presumption that CSEA was not disbursing child support payments within time periods prescribed by law whereas claim of class was based in "uncashed check" and "bad address" category.
|
|||||
| Lathrop v. Sakatani, NO. 27472,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The appellate court dismissed the individuals' appeal from the trial court's grant of defendants' motion to expunge a lis pendens on property against which the lis pendens had been recorded as the property had been sold to a third party; thus, the sale precluded the appellate court from granting relief.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
