 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rita v. State, NO. 27093,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Perez, NO. 27548,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Second hour of defendant's detention was concededly pretextual and therefore could not be justified under the Vance and Langley decisions because normal processing for defendant's shoplifting arrest should have taken approximately one hour, and his processing was ceased while waiting for narcotics detectives.
|
|||||
| Sung Hong Wong v. Cayetano, NO. 27117,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, August 28, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Berbig v. Jensen, NO. 26003,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a lawsuit for personal injuries, judgment of the trial court, entered after the jury entered a special verdict, was affirmed because the alleged evidentiary errors cited by plaintiff were harmless and did not affect the outcome of the case. Trial court had discretion to permit witnesses to testify out of sequence.
|
|||||
| Ibara v. State, NO. 27013,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly denied petitioner's Haw. R. Penal P. 40 motion for postconviction relief where his claims were previously ruled upon or were waived. His claims were also patently frivolous and without a trace of support either in the record or from other evidence submitted by him.
|
|||||
| Ibara v. State, NO. 27623,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court properly granted the State's motion to dismiss a Haw. R. Penal P. 40 petition for postconviction relief where petitioner's claims were previously ruled upon in his prior motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment or were waived.
|
|||||
| State v. Mudrick, NO. 27090,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A family court committed plain error where it imposed a sentence based on defendant's refusal to admit guilt with respect to offense of abuse of family or household members; it appeared that defendant's sentence of probation for a period of one year and five days of imprisonment would not have been as severe if he had affirmatively admitted guilt.
|
|||||
| State v. Takara, NO. 25839,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, August 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
