 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rivera v. Rivera, NO. 27464,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, September 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Inter alia, where family court awarded wife return of $ 15,464 ($ 14,000 lent to husband for his business, and $ 1,464 reimbursement for home repairs), on remand, court had to explain why husband had to reimburse those amounts to wife, how wife was to be paid, and segregate marital partnership expenditures from non-marital partnership expenditures.
|
|||||
| State v. Kupahu, NO. 26580,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, September 19, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Onaka v. Onaka, NO. 24463,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, September 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Preble v. Bd. of Trs., NO. 25714,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, September 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellants' continued attempt on appeal to obtain attorney's fees was dismissed as moot because the court's recent decision had determined that a retirement board did not have authority to award fees. As such, appellants did not have an effective remedy and did not have a justiciable claim.
|
|||||
| Preble v. Bd. of Trs. of the Emples. Ret. Sys. of Haw., NO. 26186, NO. 26292,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, September 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A circuit court's failure to conduct a hearing on the issue of fees and costs in an action regarding pension payments was harmless error because a board was not authorized to award such by statute. However, a hearing was required to determine the interest eligibility of the pension beneficiaries under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 88-74.5.
|
|||||
| Vanstory v. State, NO. 27021,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, September 20, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's decision pursuant to Haw. R. Penal P. 35 related to an earlier restitution order was affirmed because defendant had not established that there was merit to his claims presented on appeal and defendant had not provided the court with a record of the trial court's transcript as required by Haw. R. App. P. 10(b).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
