LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Hawaii - October 4 - October 5, 2006

  
Bylsma v. Haw. State Judiciary, NO. 28160, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In the Interest of Doe Children, NO. 27382, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Where the father was incarcerated, there was substantial evidence in the record to support the family court's termination of the father's parental rights and award of permanent custody of the children to the Department of Human Services (Hawai'i).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Keck, No. 27311, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Martins, NO. 26220, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's rights under the Sixth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and Haw. Const. art. I, § 14 were violated when a trial court refused to appoint counsel after one was allowed to withdraw since six requirements were not considered before the trial court held that defendant had waived counsel; four prior appointments occurred in another case.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Schneidewind, NO. 27160, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 4, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's convictions for violating a protective order under Haw. Rev. Stat. § 586-11 were upheld on appeal because neither a mistake of fact nor a mistake of law defense under Haw. Rev. Stat. §§ 702-218, 702-220 were available based on his contention that he was unaware that the service of legal documents by friends was prohibited.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Balanay v. Shima's Mkt., Inc., NO. 28016, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Johnson v. Nakkim, NO. 28047, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Rivera v. Rivera, NO. 27464, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
State v. Smith, NO. 26362, SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wu v. Admin. Dir. of the Court, NO. 26287, INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 5, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court properly upheld order from Administrative Director of the Courts for State of Hawaii revoking petitioner's driver's license where Director did not "exceed" her authority in refusing to consider that petitioner's first conviction for driving under influence of alcohol was set aside; 1995 administrative revocation of his license remained valid.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.