 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kaanapali Hillside Homeowners' Ass'n v. Doran, NO. 25585,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lot owners implicitly contracted and agreed to pay assessments authorized under a homeowners association's charter and bylaws. Without the ability to impose and collect assessments, the association would not have been able to sustain its operations.
|
|||||
| Porter v. Porter, NO. 28066,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 13, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An appeal from a family court was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was untimely filed, and there was no excusable neglect under Haw. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B) where the late filing was merely due to conflicting vacation schedules, rather than a plausible misconstruction of the time requirements.
|
|||||
| Buenaventura v. State, NO. 27384,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petitioner's no contest plea was knowing and voluntary because the extensive and unchallenged on-the-record colloquy, Haw. R. Penal Proc. 11, coupled with the petitioner's acknowledgment on the change of plea form, demonstrated that he was aware of the possible immigration consequences of a no contest plea.
|
|||||
| Contrades v. Reis, NO. 27510,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where trial court granted intervenor's motion to intervene after denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of summary judgment in favor of defendant, appellate court lacked jurisdiction because prior to time plaintiff and intervenor filed notices of appeal, intervenor had become party, but her defenses remained undecided.
|
|||||
| State v. A.M., NO. 27556,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 16, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court had not erred in finding defendant violated Haw. Rev. Stat. § 291C-102 by speeding and denying her motion to strike police officer's testimony as there was evidence (1) officer had present recollection that was refreshed by a writing, Haw. R. Evid. 612, and (2) of a past recollection recorded to support finding that defendant was speeding.
|
|||||
| Cedillos v. State, NO. 27428,
SUPREME COURT OF HAWAI'I, October 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pono v. Molokai Ranch, LTD, NO. 28080,
INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF HAWAI'I, October 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In multi-party litigation, the circuit court's judgment did not resolve all claims against all parties or contain the finding necessary for certification under Haw. R. Civ. P. 54(b). The judgment did not satisfy the requirements for an appealable, final judgment under Haw. R. Civ. P. 58.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
