 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Mannos v. Moss, Docket No. 31958, 2007 Opinion No. 34,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court erred by granting summary judgment to stock sellers on a buyer's fraud claim, Idaho Code § 30-14-509, because they conceded that the financial statement did not disclose an obligation to a creditor, and it was disputed as to whether information explaining the discrepancy was made available to the buyer prior to completion of the transaction.
|
|||||
| Mercy Med. Ctr. v. Ada County, Docket No. 32729, 2007 Opinion No. 32,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital's request to the Medical Indigency Pre-Litigation Screening Panel was proper under Idaho Code §§ 31-3551 and 31-3553 as the Board of Ada County Commisioners' decision denying an application for medical indigency benefits dealt with resources. Under Idaho Code § 31-3554, hospital filed petition for review before expiration of time period.
|
|||||
| Norton v. Cal. Ins. Guar. Ass'n, Docket No. 31558, 2007 Opinion No. 33,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court properly modified arbitration award between driver and insurance guarantee association where arbitrator ruled on matter not submitted by entering an award against the association; under Idaho Code § 7-913(a)(2), it preserved issues submitted while affecting issue of association's liability, which was not submitted for arbitration.
|
|||||
| Dilulo v. Anderson & Wood Co., Docket No. 32499, 2007 Opinion No. 38,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An Idaho Industrial Commission decision that an employee was not entitled to further medical treatment for back injuries caused by a backhoe accident was supported by substantial evidence because the employee's medical evidence did not indicate that his injuries required present medical treatment, as required under Idaho Code Ann. § 72-432(1).
|
|||||
| Piske v. Freeman, Docket No. 31816, 2007 Opinion No. 35,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal was dismissed in access easement dispute because supreme court did not have a final judgment before it since, after filing of appeal and briefing in case, district court entered an amended decision as to the width of the easement, and no amended notice of appeal was filed. Thus, supreme court did not have final judgment briefed and argued.
|
|||||
| Sons & Daughters of Idaho, Inc. v. Idaho Lottery Comm'n, Docket No. 32218, 2007 Opinion No. 36,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Idaho Lottery Commission's finding that nonprofit organizations failed to keep and account for all checks from games in violation of Idaho Code § 67-7709(1)(b) was proper. In violation of Idaho Code § 67-7711(3), organizers were being compensated and equipment provider was conducting games. Statutes were not vague under Idaho Const. art. III, § 16.
|
|||||
| Wichterman v. J. H. Kelly, Inc., Docket No. 32526, 2007 Opinion No. 37,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's claim for impairment and disability benefits was time barred under Idaho Code § 72-706. The finding that the employee failed to meet his burden of proving causation was supported by substantial and competent evidence. Employer was awarded attorney fees and expenses under Idaho App. R. 11.1 where the employee engaged in wrongful conduct.
|
|||||
| State v. Al-Sadoun, No. 32047, Ref. No. 06R-65,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| State v. Mann, NO. 32214. Ref. No. 07R-244,
SUPREME COURT OF IDAHO, February 27, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
