LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Illinois - January 17 - January 18, 2007

  
In re Marriage of Thomsen, No. 2-06-0289, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, January 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in concealing the identity of the college that the father's daughter was attending despite the fact that the father was called upon to help pay her educational expenses; language of relevant statute, 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/513(a)(2), did not mandate that the name of a college had to be disclosed to a parent.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Czarobski v. Lata, No. 1-06-1537, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, January 18, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Circuit court's dismissal of the home buyers' complaint regarding a discrepancy in real estate taxes at a closing was reversed, and the case was remanded because the merger doctrine did not apply to the buyers' action for real estate taxes as the buyers and the sellers both did not know that a tax bill was based on a partial assessment.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Alexander, No. 3-04-0892, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: It was not "inherently implausible" that a rational trier of fact could have found sufficient proof of defendant's sexual gratification to support his conviction for sexual exploitation of a child. An administrative order granting the trial judge authority to impose a $ 10 DNA collection fee exceeded the powers granted under Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 21(b).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.