 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Hamilton, NO. 5-05-0208,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIFTH DISTRICT, March 29, 2006, Decided , March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a domestic battery case where the State sought to use the deceased victim's bond revocation hearing testimony at trial, 725 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/110-6(f)(3) explicitly barred the use of such testimony and contained no exception for the case of a deceased victim.
|
|||||
| People v. Mendoza, No. 2-05-0132,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted defendant's motion to suppress; his right to be free from unreasonable seizures under U.S. Const. amend. IV and Ill. Const. art. I, § 6 was violated when police officer continued to question him after traffic stop ended and that seizure, unsupported by reasonable suspicion, led to discovery of evidence against him.
|
|||||
| People v. Wilson, No. 1-03-3552,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, THIRD DIVISION, March 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in denying motion to suppress where it failed to evaluate whether officers had reasonable suspicion to believe that defendant, who was on mandatory supervised release (MSR), had narcotics or guns in his home or otherwise violated the terms of his MSR so that the search was justified at its inception under the Fourth Amendment.
|
|||||
| People v. Ligon, No. 1-04-1389,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, March 30, 2006, Decided , March 30, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Aggravated vehicular hijacking conviction under 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/18-4(a)(3) was affirmed as the evidence was sufficient as the jury's finding that a BB gun could have been used as a dangerous weapon was not erroneous. Further, the sentence was affirmed as the enhancement of the sentence under 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/33B-1 was proper.
|
|||||
| Pinckneyville Cmty. Hosp. v. Indus. Comm'n (Downen), NO. 5-05-0204WC,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIFTH DISTRICT, INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION DIVISION, March 30, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A hospital's employee was properly awarded benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act, 820 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 305/1 et seq., after suffering a hemorrhage and stroke while giving a speech at a retirement dinner. The Industrial Commission's determination of the conflicting expert testimony was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
