 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Boeckenhauer v. Joe Rizza Lincoln Mercury, No. 2-06-0604,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, April 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As used car buyers' claims that an apparent agency relationship existed between auto manufacturer and dealership where they bought a used car that had a wheel fall off did not amount to a bad faith argument, manufacturer was not entitled to attorney fees under 815 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 505/10a(c), even though it prevailed at trial.
|
|||||
| In re Marriage of Matchen, No. 2-06-0749,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, April 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In light of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/609(a)), the trial court's denial of a mother's petition for removal was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. A move to Wisconsin would not provide any meaningful enhancement in circumstances for the children in terms of schools.
|
|||||
| Somers v. Quinn, No. 2-05-0619,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, April 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although possession of a medical license was not necessary for expert to testify, trial court did not abuse discretion in excluding testimony based on the totality of the circumstances, including the lack of license. Denial of continuance was not abuse of discretion, as patient had notice expert was not licensed and failed to secure another expert.
|
|||||
| Elec. Energy, Inc. v. Hamer, NO. 5-05-0467,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIFTH DISTRICT, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Taxpayer, corporation engaged in wholesale production of electricity, was not entitled to refund of portion of use tax for the percentage of coal used to produce type C fly ash, sold to produce cement, because the taxpayer was not a manufacturer, but a service business, and did not qualify for exemption under 35 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 105/2 (2004).
|
|||||
| Kelley v. Sheriff's Merit Comm'n, No. 2-06-0624,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, April 12, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in affirming the county sheriff's merit commission's decision that suspended corrections officer for refusing to submit to a polygraph examination; while she was not protected by 50 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 725/3.11, which applied only to peace officers, she was protected by Kaske decision, which deemed such exams too unreliable.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
