 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Stechly, Docket No. 97544.,
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS, April 19, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's convictions of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child and other crimes were reversed, because hearsay statements concerning abuse of a child were testimonial in nature, and admission of the statements without giving defendant an opportunity to cross-examine the child violated defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confrontation.
|
|||||
| People v. Turner, No. 2-05-0808,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After a bench trial, defendant obtained a remand with regard to his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, in violation of 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 570/402(c), since the trial court erred by not considering a third party's admissions to owning certain drug items found in defendant's truck, which served as the basis for the conviction.
|
|||||
| People v. Woods, No. 3-04-0742,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, April 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Failure to remove shackles was not plain error as record was void of evidence shackling hindered defendant's ability to assist attorney, compromised presumption of innocence, or demeaned dignity of proceedings. Rational trier of fact could have concluded gesture to waist indicated defendant was armed, as required for aggravated robbery conviction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
