LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Illinois - June 29, 2006

  
Finnin v. Bob Lindsay, Inc., No. 3-05-0428, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment to the owner of a car dealership in the buyers' breach of contract action as the buyers' modifications to an agreement that the owner signed for the sale of the car dealership constituted a counteroffer to which the owner did not agree.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ruiz v. City of Chicago, 1-04-1740, 1-04-2591 (Consolidated), APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, June 29, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In the medical malpractice case, the trial court did not err in finding that the estate administrator's paramedic witness did not qualify as an expert. The paramedic was from a Florida community that was unlike the community at issue in the instant case. The paramedic witness repeatedly admitted that he did not know the local standard of care.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Smith v. Boudreau, No. 1-04-3175, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, June 29, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly dismissed claimant's amended complaint alleging violation of his state and federal civil rights through use or allowing use of excessive force to get him to confess during interrogation; claims were time barred under two-year limitations period in 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/13-202, as measured from time the force was used.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.