 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Sharon H. (In re Sharena H.), No. 1-05-4012,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIFTH DIVISION, June 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly found that a child was neglected pursuant to 705 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 405/2-3(1) (2004), as the evidence supported findings that the child was exposed to drugs at the time of her birth and that the mother's continued drug abuse put the child in an injurious environment.
|
|||||
| Phoenix Bond & Indem. Co. v. Mattingly (In re County Collector), No. 1-05-2115,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, THIRD DIVISION, June 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Circuit court properly denied a company's motion for reinstatement of a tax deed because 35 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 200/22-80 was not applicable because a prior order issuing the tax deed was void as it violated an automatic stay after the owner filed for bankruptcy, and the owner deposited redemption funds within the extended redemption period.
|
|||||
| Stillo v. State Ret. Sys., No. 1-05-2828,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, June 30, 2006, Decided , June 30, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly upheld a decision by the board of a state judges' retirement system which denied a former judge's application for a refund of contributions paid into the retirement system because the instant claim was barred by res judicata, as the judge failed to challenge the method used to calculate any refund in an earlier action.
|
|||||
| Vill. of Frankfort v. Ill. EPA, No. 1-05-1929,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, June 30, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was proper to dismiss village's complaint against the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The District had exclusive jurisdiction to provide sewage treatment within its boundaries, and participation of both entities in sewage management did not violate the Supremacy Clause.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
