LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Illinois - June 21, 2007

  
People v. Holland, No. 1-05-4014, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in denying defendant's petition to expunge convictions for which defendant had received an executive pardon, because 20 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 2630/5(c) (2004) did not restrict eligibility to defendants that had been acquitted of charges and did not have prior criminal records.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Jolly, NO. 4-05-1015, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's postconviction relief petition pursuant to 725 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/122-1 through 122-8 (2004) was properly denied, because defendant failed to claim ineffectiveness by post-plea counsel in his postconviction petition, and thus defendant forfeited any claims of ineffectiveness by post-plea counsel.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Kellems, NO. 4-06-0824, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in revoking defendant's supervision as probation officer who filed petition to revoke lacked authority to do so; authority to file such petitions was not a probation officer duty listed in 730 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 110/12, but rather was solely within the power of the State's Attorney under 55 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/3-9005(a)(1).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Lyons, NO. 4-06-0110, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress evidence in a trial on drug charges, as the search warrant for defendant's residence was supported by probable cause, and the State established that a confidential informant was a sufficiently reliable and trustworthy source of information.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Montgomery, NO. 4-05-0151, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly denied a continuance on the first day of jury selection for substitution of counsel because he failed to identify a specific attorney that had been secured and failed to show that he had the financial resources to hire an attorney of his choice.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Wheeler, Docket No. 102550., SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS, June 21, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: As defendant's murder case relied heavily on the credibility of police witnesses, the prosecutor's utilization of closing arguments to inflame the passions of the jury was a material factor. Without the arguments, a contrary verdict could have been reached; thus, a new trial was appropriate (U.S. Const. amend. XIV, Ill. Const. art. I, § 2 (1970)).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
S. Ill. Univ. Found. v. Stark (In re Estate of Stark), NO. 4-06-0778, APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, June 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where claims under 755 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 45/2-7 and 2-10 regarding an agent's authority to renounce will under a durable power of attorney was contingent upon whether the power of attorney was valid in the first place and validity issue was still pending, there was just reason to delay beneficiaries' appeal pursuant to Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 304(a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.