 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Doe v. Dilling, No. 1-04-2372,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, SIXTH DIVISION, September 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Verdict in favor of plaintiff on a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation against the parents of plaintiff's fiance was vacated because plaintiff's reliance on the parents' statements that plaintiff's fiance was suffering from heavy-metal poisoning, when in fact the fiance was suffering from HIV, was not reasonable.
|
|||||
| Hoffelt v. Ill. Dep't of Human Rights, No.1-05-1629,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIFTH DIVISION, September 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Final order of Illinois Department of Human Rights, issued through its chief legal counsel, that dismissed claimant's sex discrimination and unlawful retaliation charges was partly affirmed and partly reversed; allegations regarding sex discrimination charge were not severe or pervasive enough, but her retaliation claims were adequately supported.
|
|||||
| Lange v. Freund, No. 1-03-0106,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, SIXTH DIVISION, September 1, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A judgment in favor of defendant in plaintiffs' action alleging that defendant's negligence in causing an auto accident caused the death of plaintiffs' unborn child was affirmed, as the trial court properly instructed the jury that the number of witnesses on either side of the case was not dispositive of the issues and the facts.
|
|||||
| People v. Tara, No. 2-05-1044,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, September 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding dog was vicious dog under 510 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/2.19b was upheld as court could have found puncture wound to victim's harm and resulting lump of scar tissue requiring plastic surgery supported finding of "serious physical injury," and there was no reason for dog to "protect" persons it was with even if victim had been power walking.
|
|||||
| Softcheck v. Imesch, No. 3-04-0398, 3-04-0399 cons.,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, September 1, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the alleged victims' third-amended complaint asserting two priests sexually abused them was proper; their claims were barred by Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 110, para. 13-202 and Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 110, para. 13-211, as they did not bring their claims within two years of turning 18 years of age or within two years of date claims accrued.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
