 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Maxit, Inc. v. Van Cleve, No. 2-06-1025,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, August 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Byron, No. 104657,
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS, August 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Sangamon County Sheriff's Dep't v. State Human Rights Comm'n, NO. 4-06-0445,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, August 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| City of Chicago v. Comcast Cable Holdings, L.L.C., No. 1-05-3566,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, August 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Csaszar, No. 1-05-1087,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, August 23, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Convictions finding defendant guilty of solicitation of murder involving undercover agent solicitation and solicitation of murder involving confidential informant were reversed; improper lesser-included offenses were involved, as he was convicted of greater offense in the same trial and because he was acquitted of greater offense in earlier trial.
|
|||||
| Taylor v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals, No. 1-05-0374,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, August 23, 2007, Decided, August 23, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a property had reconverted to use as a single-family residence, and at the time the current property owner acquired the property, it was certified as a four-unit dwelling, Evanston, Ill., Zoning Ordinance § 6-6-4-7 prohibited reconversion to a more intensive use. Thus, a fifth unit was not a legal nonconforming use of the property.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
