 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Briggs v. Walker, NO. 4-06-0454,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, September 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of an inmate's request for an injunction compelling a state DOC to transfer him to a minimum-security facility and allow him to participate in a work and day release program was proper because courts were not to intervene in matters within the discretion of the DOC, including the location of where inmates were assigned and housed.
|
|||||
| Gore v. Ind. Ins. Co., No. 1-06-3325,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, THIRD DIVISION, September 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The duty of good faith and fair dealing required no refund of insurance premiums related to an unconstitutional tax because (1) insurers' contracts with an insured granted no discretion, (2) the insurers' decided to recover the tax in premiums before their contracts with the insured, and (3) the insurers could recover taxes on sales to the insured.
|
|||||
| Negron v. City of Chicago, No. 1-05-0405,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, THIRD DIVISION, September 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in entering judgment in favor of a city as to some police officers as to a mandamus action challenging a college credit requirement for promotion in a police department, because the doctrine of laches did not bar the claims, as the city was not prejudiced by the officers' delay in joining the action.
|
|||||
| People v. Feazell, No. 1-05-1065,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, THIRD DIVISION, September 5, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court violated defendant's right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment and the precedent set in Crawford when a co-defendant's testimony was improperly allowed into evidence through a detective. The co-defendant's statements were the statements of one co-defendant under the pressure of interrogation against another co-defendant.
|
|||||
| People v. Lillie M. (In re Lillie M.), NO. 4-06-0947,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, September 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Shipp, NO. 4-06-0288,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FOURTH DISTRICT, September 5, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Pekin Ins. Co. v. Beu, No. 1-06-1676,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, September 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted judgment on pleadings to insurance company after individuals claimed insurance company was obligated to provide coverage to them in underlying negligence action against them; one individual was not named additional insured on policy and underlying complaint did not solely name other individual, as coverage required.
|
|||||
| People v. Bailey, No. 2-05-1260,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, September 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
