|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Illinois - September 20, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
Frigo v. Silver Cross Hosp. & Med. Ctr., No. 1-05-1240,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: A hospital's regulations and bylaws were not within the purview of the Medical Studies Act, 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/8-2101, 8-2102, privilege, and the trial court did not err when it denied the hospital's JNOV motion. Sufficient evidence supported a negligent credentialing claim, based on granting a physician surgical privileges.
|
|
| |
Iseberg v. Gross, Docket No. 103332.,
SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS, September 20, 2007, Opinion Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Appellate court did not err in affirming dismissal of claimant's negligence claim, which alleged two business partners knew of threats former mutual business partner made against claimant, but did not warn him; "special relationship" did not exist between two business partners and claimant, and, thus, they did not have affirmative duty to warn him.
|
|
| |
Long v. Elborno, No. 1-05-3953,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FOURTH DIVISION, September 20, 2007, Decided
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court properly granted hospital's motion to dismiss the patient's medical malpractice action filed against it; evidence showed that she failed to exercise reasonable diligence in serving the hospital with her summons and complaint, and, therefore, dismissal of her medical malpractice action pursuant to Ill. Sup. Ct. 103(b) was warranted.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|