 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Highway Traffic Safety Assocs., LLC v. Gomien & Harrop, No. 3-05-0786,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, October 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in denying the law firm's motion to vacate for lack of personal jurisdiction, as Maryland court had personal jurisdiction over the law firm when Maryland court entered a default judgment against the law firm; pursuant to Md. Code Ann., Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 6-103(b)(1), law firm had been transacting business in Maryland.
|
|||||
| Norris v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., No. 1-05-3132,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, SECOND DIVISION, October 17, 2006, Decided , October 17, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's confirmation of an arbitration award was affirmed as the appellate court's prior rulings in an appeal regarding the reform of an insurance policy to include uninsured motorist coverage were not palpably erroneous. Further, the arbitration conducted was mandatory and binding under the 1989 version of 215 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/143a.
|
|||||
| People v. Ford, No. 1-04-1392,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, October 17, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of defendant's probation and prison sentence were affirmed as the trial court considered defendant's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel and ruled that he did not make a colorable claim, the sentence was not disproportionate, and defendant was not prejudiced by the inadequate admonishments under Ill. Sup. Ct. R. 605(a).
|
|||||
| State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Coe, No. 1-05-1891,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, SECOND DIVISION, October 17, 2006, Decided , October 17, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment award to an insurer in a declaratory judgment action against an insured was affirmed because the setoff for workers' compensation benefits in an insurance policy did not violate the purpose of the underinsured motorist statute, 215 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/143a-2(4), and therefore, did not violate public policy.
|
|||||
| Tyler v. Gibbons, No. 3-05-0754,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, October 18, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The officers and directors adequately supported the 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/2-619 motion, which alleged res judicata and the economic loss doctrine, as they submitted an affidavit, certified copies of the corporation's certificate of incorporation, and a verified complaint of the previous action.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
