 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Blair v. Nev. Landing P'ship, No. 2-06-0328,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, SECOND DISTRICT, December 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's picture, although it was displayed via several mediums over a period of time, was used for a single purpose and for a single audience; use of picture was a single overt act, there was no continuing violation, and employee's appropriation-of-likeness claims under 765 Ill. Comp. Stat. 1075/1 et seq. (2002) and common law were time-barred.
|
|||||
| Cordts v. Chi. Tribune Co., No. 1-06-1158,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, SIXTH DIVISION, December 8, 2006, Decided , December 8, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's ex-wife natural and proper interest in employee's treatment for depression was not a specified defense to a breach of Confidentiality Act, 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 110/1 et seq.; thus, a trial court erred in dismissing the employee's claim for the disclosure of his depression to his ex-wife by his employer's disability claims evaluator.
|
|||||
| N. River Ins. Co. v. Grinnell Mut. Reinsurance Co., No. 1-05-0606,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, SIXTH DIVISION, December 8, 2006, Decided , December 8, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly granted summary judgment to plaintiff insurer on its claim for reimbursement of funds from defendant's primary insurance policy, which were paid from plaintiff's excess policy to fund settlement in underlying litigation, because underlying contract did not require plaintiff's insured to vertically exhaust consecutive coverage.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. Madigan v. Ill. Commerce Comm'n, No. 1-06-3014,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, THIRD DIVISION, December 8, 2006, Decided , December 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Without determining whether a telephone company's pending petitions in another district for review of the Illinois Commerce Commission's orders were premature, the court granted the company's motion to transfer the State's petition for review to the other district.
|
|||||
| People v. Angela E. (In re A.E.), No. 3-06-0594,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, THIRD DISTRICT, December 8, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Pursuant to 705 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 405/2-29, the trial court had authority to terminate parental rights with regard to a minor who was under the age of 21, so long as the minor was adjudicated abused, neglected, or dependent and a subsequent dispositional order was entered by the court when the minor was under 18 years of age.
|
|||||
| Reyes v. Corral (In re Reyes), No. 1-06-1534,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIFTH DIVISION, December 8, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A putative father's name on his son's birth certificate was sufficient proof that he signed a written acknowledgement of parentage as required by 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 45/5(a) and 410 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 535/12(4), (5); thus, under 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 50/8(b) the father's consent was required for a stepfather to adopt the son.
|
|||||
| Harlin v. Sears Roebuck & Co., No. 1-05-2749,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIRST DIVISION, December 11, 2006, Decided , December 11, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment award to a department store was affirmed because, even if the corner of a display stand upon which a minor child fell was a dangerous condition, the store did not owe the victim a duty. Rather, the mother, who saw the stand, was made aware of any dangerous condition, even if the victim could not have been expected to appreciate it.
|
|||||
| McGaw Med. Ctr. of Northwestern Univ. v. Dep't of Empl. Sec., No. 1-05-2916,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIRST DIVISION, December 11, 2006, Decided , December 11, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly dismissed employer's action seeking review of unemployment benefit award because the employer failed to name the review board that issued the decision as a defendants as required by 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/3-103, 3-107; compliance with the pleading rules in the statutes was mandatory and jurisdictional.
|
|||||
| People v. Reyes, Nos. 1-04-1047 & 1-04-1150 Consolidated,
APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS, FIRST DISTRICT, FIRST DIVISION, December 11, 2006, Decided , December 11, 2006, Opinion Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's judgment summarily dismissing defendants' postconviction petitions was reversed where defendants had alleged the gist of a constitutional claim, defendants' allegations against the detective were sufficiently "newly discovered," and any allegation that the detective coerced a person to provide evidence was relevant.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
