 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cline v. State, No. 73A01-0603-CR-104,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When defendant, who had been stopped by an officer for speeding, handed a bag of marijuana to his passenger and told the passenger to hide it, he had "delivered" the marijuana to the passenger under Ind. Code § 35-48-1-11; thus, the evidence was sufficient to support his conviction of dealing in marijuana in violation of Ind. Code § 35-48-4-10.
|
|||||
| Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Evansville Vanderburgh Pub. Library, No. 82A01-0510-CV-478,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Library's loss of a historic building due to damage suffered during excavation was not covered by the subject policy; the general exclusion in the subject policy completely excluded the library's loss from coverage because the damages resulted from contruction-type activities that were never intended by the parties to be included in the policy.
|
|||||
| LePore v. Norwest Bank, No. 45A05-0608-CV-418,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When plaintiff, having left a copy of the complaint and summons at defendant's residence, sent a copy by certified mail instead of mailing a copy by first class mail under Ind. R. Trial P. 4.1(B), the court had personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff's actions were reasonably calculated under Ind. R. Trial P. 4.15(F) to inform defendant of the suit.
|
|||||
| State v. CCI, LLC, No. 49A02-0602-CV-138,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, January 25, 2007, Decided , January 25, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A subcontractor did not prove that a construction project owner was unjustly enriched by a retainage kept by a general contractor because it admitted that the owner was not unjustly enriched, nor did it prove that the general contractor owned the retainage, as the general contractor's breach forced the owner to finish the project at a higher cost.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
