 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Salyers v. State, No. 20S00-0509-CR-412,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence of life without parole was not error because, although defendant pled guilty but mentally ill to murdering policeman, trial court properly placed great weight on aggravator of murdering law enforcement officer under Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9(b)(6), and minimal weight to mitigators of defendant's mental illness and lack of criminal record.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Toney, No. 94S00-0602-CQ-48,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Upon certification of questions from a federal court, the state supreme court determined that for purposes of the Groves test for negligent infliction of emotional distress, a fiance was not an analogous relationship to marriage, and that the proximity requirement was a matter of both time and circumstances.
|
|||||
| Snow v. England, No. 03S05-0608-CV-293,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, March 13, 2007, Decided , March 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Husband's motion to modify provision of property settlement agreement under which husband agreed to pay money to wife for support of wife's grandson should have been dismissed because Ind. Code § 31-15-2-17(a)(3) permitted support provision only for children of parties, and provision was not modifiable as maintenance or property division.
|
|||||
| Graves v. Johnson, No. 34A02-0607-CV-563,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, March 16, 2007, Decided , March 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for insurer on owners' claim for money under insurance claim was proper because insurer had tendered to tenants a check for the claim payable to tenants' business and an owner. Under Ind. Code § 26-1-3.1-310(b)(1), this suspended obligation, despite fact that tenants allegedly forged owner's endorsement and embezzled the funds.
|
|||||
| Ind. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Butcher, No. 49A02-0603-CV-223,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, March 16, 2007, Decided , March 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence did not support the finding that pregnant patient sustained physical injuries as result of negligence of doctor or community hospital, as patient would have had to undergo emergency surgery even if not transported to second hospital and there was no evidence that the extensive scarring and painful recovery were caused by the malpractice.
|
|||||
| Ind. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Winkle, No. 49A05-0511-CV-653,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, March 16, 2007, Decided , March 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although emotional distress suffered was the result of the injury to the unborn child and not patient, plaintiff were not entitled to separate damages cap because nature of injury was derivative and thus, recovery was limited. Plaintiffs were not entitled to additional caps for claims as unborn child was not "patient" from whom claims could derive.
|
|||||
| Schuler v. Graf, No. 15A01-0604-CV-155,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, March 16, 2007, Decided , March 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was affirmed as contract's legal description satisfied Indiana Statute of Frauds as contract provided that parties had agreed on boundaries, which furnished means of identification and satisfied Statute of Frauds. Parol evidence was properly admitted to complete legal description, which proved that parties agreed on boundaries.
|
|||||
| Turner v. State, No. 29A02-0603-CR-199,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, March 16, 2007, Decided , March 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence gathered at scene of traffic stop and defendant's statement to police should not have been admitted pursuant to Ind. Const. art. I, § 11 because stop was pretextual, officer who conducted the stop for speeding was unsure of posted speed limit, and connection between illegal stop and defendant's confession was not sufficiently attenuated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
