|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Indiana - April 16, 2007
|
| |
Arnett v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., No. 71A05-0605-CV-257,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 16, 2007, Decided , April 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: When an employer had expressly rejected excess UM/UIM coverage in an application for commercial umbrella coverage, as was permitted by Ind. Code § 27-7-5-2, the insurer was not required to provide excess UM/UIM coverage to an employee when the policy did not provide for such coverage. Because of the rejection, there was no expectation of coverage.
|
|
| |
|
| |
T.W. v. State, No. 49A05-0608-JV-434,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 16, 2007, Decided , April 16, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Although a violation of Ind. Code § 31-37-2-2 was the basis for revocation of a juvenile's probation, an independent adjudication of delinquency under Ind. Code § 31-37-2-1 was not sought; because a juvenile lacked permission to be at her sister's home and did not return when requested, the evidence was sufficient to revoke her probation.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|