LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Indiana - April 17, 2007

  
Broadhacker v. City of Indianapolis, No. 49A02-0511-CV-1084, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: There was an issue of fact as to whether a club was private and thus not subject to a nuisance ordinance. The club had no indicative signage and did not advertise locally; it did not direct or invite the public inside; and there was no evidence that persons were able to enter the club without being members or that it accepted every applicant.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Carnes v. Estate of Carnes, CAUSE NO. 90A02-0511-CV-1082, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Gilpin v. Ivy Tech State College, No. 49A05-0608-CV-412, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because an injured person was a licensee while heading toward a restroom at a college campus, and he was aware of gravel on a sidewalk before he slipped and fell as he walked on the gravel over the length of the sidewalk and was standing on it for 10 to 15 seconds, there was no latent danger, and the college was not liable for his injury.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Heagy v. Kean, No. 48A02-0603-JV-234, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: It was proper to deny a father's motion to modify custody under Ind. Code § 31-14-13-6 based on exposure to secondhand smoke. The mother testified that her house was now smoke-free; the child's physician characterized the child as being healthy; the parties described her as healthy; and the father's experts had not seen her recent medical history.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
McElroy v. State, No. 71A05-0610-PC-606, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Plea counsel was not ineffective for failing to make double jeopardy objection when inmate was sentenced on two Class C felonies under Ind. Code §§ 9-30-5-5, 9-26-1-1; the inmate was not punished twice for death of accident victim, he was punished for causing the victim's death and also for failing to stop after the accident.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
West Am. Ins. Co. v. Cates, CAUSE NO. 42A01-0601-CV-26, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Wilhelm v. Madison Vill., MHC, LLC, No. 39A01-0607-CV-303, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, April 17, 2007, Decided , April 17, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court had jurisdiction over mobile home operator's eviction action, as well as its action for a money judgment, pursuant to Ind. Code § 33-29-2-4, and, thus, eviction action and money judgments entered against the one mobile home resident were proper; also, she did not show an Ind. R. Trial P. 60(B) ground for setting the judgments aside.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.