 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bateman v. Adams County Dep't of Child Servs. (In re C.B.), No. 01A02-0701-JV-9,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 11, 2007, Decided , May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly admitted county child welfare agency's predispositional report where the county child welfare agency sought finding that mother's two-year-old son was child in need of services; Ind. Code § 31-37-18-2 allowed report to be admitted because it contained evidence of probative value even though it also contained hearsay material.
|
|||||
| In re Coleman, Supreme Court Cause No. 49S00-0610-DI-366,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 11, 2007, Decided , May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer was suspended for 30 days pursuant to Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, and otherwise, because, inter alia, lawyer failed to respond to court and worker's compensation board in various specific instances, failed to file pleadings and disclosures as directed by those tribunals, and failed to respond to client or communicate with the client.
|
|||||
| In re Slocombe, Supreme Court Cause No. 98S00-0702-DI-71,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 11, 2007, Decided , May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer was suspended in Indiana pursuant to Ind. R. Admis. Bar & Disc. Att'ys 23(28) because lawyer had been suspended in Michgan, and there was no showing of any reason why reciprocal discipline should not issue in Indiana.
|
|||||
| In re Spurgeon Green, Supreme Court Cause No. 98S00-0605-DI-177,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 11, 2007, Decided , May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Reciprocal discipline of suspension in Indiana was imposed upon an attorney pursuant to Ind. R. Admis. Bar & Disc. Att'ys 23(28) because attorney, who was disbarred in Georgia for acts of misconduct in which attorney was paid for services and failed to act on behalf of or communicate with his clients, failed to respond to order to show cause.
|
|||||
| Tamko Roofing Prods. v. Dilloway, No. 46A05-0608-CV-443,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 11, 2007, Decided , May 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment for plaintiff in an action against a corporation arising from shingles manufactured by the corporation was affirmed, as the trial court properly determined that the corporation had waived its right to arbitration because the timing of an arbitration request was belated, and the corporation filed no dispositive motions prior to trial.
|
|||||
| Am. Arbitration Ass'n v. N. Miami Cmty. Schs. , No. 52A02-0608-CV-640,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 14, 2007, Decided , May 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting preliminary injunction to prevent education association from arbitrating grievance regarding principal's severance package; the master contract between the parties had an enforceable arbitration clause that required submission of the grievance, which alleged violation of the master contract, to binding arbitration.
|
|||||
| N.H. v. Marion County Dep't of Child Servs., No. 49A04-0609-JV-504,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 14, 2007, Decided , May 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in finding that child's guardian was not a party to a child in need of services proceeding because, according to Ind. Code § 31-34-9-7, a child's guardian was a party to all proceedings described in the juvenile law and had all rights of parties under the Indiana Rules of Trial Procedure.
|
|||||
| Speedway SuperAmerica LLC v. Holmes, No. 45A05-0506-CV-332,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 14, 2007, Decided , May 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A gas station owner did not prove that it could not have obtained jeans that truck driver allegedly wore when he slipped on diesel fuel at the station within time for a motion to correct judgment under Ind. R. Trial P. 59 when the jeans were available at trial. Thus, the owner was not entitled to a new trial under Ind. R. Trial P. 60(B)(2), (3).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
