 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Cox v. Cantrell, No. 20A03-0701-CV-33,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided , May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court, having ordered that children be returned to Indiana, did not err in later transferring jurisdiction to Michigan under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Law. As Michigan had jurisdiction under PKPA, requiring the return to Indiana violated the Full Faith and Credit Clause; thus it was proper to transfer jurisdiction to Michigan.
|
|||||
| In re Eley, Supreme Court Cause No. 49S00-0606-DI-217,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided , May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer was suspended for six months for violation of, inter alia, Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3 because, in three cases, among other things, he accepted representation of clients, but failed to prosecute the clients' cases, resulting in the dismissal of one client's medical malpractice suit and another client's employment discrimination case.
|
|||||
| In re Eley, Supreme Court Cause No. 49S00-0701-DI-26,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided , May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lawyer was immediately suspended pursuant to Ind. R. Admis. Bar & Disc. Att'ys 23(10)(f)(3) because, although the lawyer responded to the first three counts of a grievance filed against him, he failed to respond to the fourth count. An order for costs was also imposed against the lawyer.
|
|||||
| In re Thompson, Supreme Court Cause No. 88S00-0701-DI-12,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided , May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An attorney was suspended for six months with 30 days active suspension and the rest conditionally stayed, after admitting cocaine possession, violating Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b), because he had no disciplinary history, took prompt and complete responsibility for his acts, and actively and successfully participated in substance abuse programs.
|
|||||
| Lambert v. State, Supreme Court Case No. 18S00-0412-SD-503,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Request to authorize successive post-conviction relief petition under Ind. R.P. Post-Conviction Remedies 1, § 12(b) was denied because petitioner had completed review to which he was entitled as matter of right, and, inter alia, in appellate court's prior decisions, a majority of justices voted to deny sentencing relief petitioner requested.
|
|||||
| Roob v. Fisher, No. 49A02-0602-CV-103,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided , May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Schumm v. State, No. 02A03-0608-CV-388,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, May 21, 2007, Decided , May 21, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Even though testimony that motor vehicle had equipment required by federal regulations was not admission that taillight was working, judgment that operator of vehicle operated vehicle with defective taillight was improper, since non-African-American operator was not precluded from asserting racial discrimination in striking African-American juror.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
