 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| In re Jaubert, Case No. 02S00-0504-DI-172,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, July 24, 2006, Decided , July 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an attorney failed to keep a client informed about a matter and because the attorney knowingly made a false statement of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter, the attorney violated Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a), and 8.1(a); consequently, the attorney was suspended for one year without automatic reinstatement.
|
|||||
| In re Recker, Case No. 49S00-0603-DI-96,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, July 24, 2006, Decided , July 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an attorney was arrested for both misdemeanor and felony operating a vehicle while intoxicated in a two-year period, the attorney violated Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b); therefore, the attorney was suspended for six months, stayed upon 12 months probation.
|
|||||
| In re Smith, Case No. 85S00-0401-DI-001,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, July 24, 2006, Decided , July 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an attorney, inter alia, did not have a signed written contingency fee agreement and commingled personal and client funds, the attorney violated Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(c), 1.15(a), (d), 8.4(b), and Ind. R. Admis. Bar & Disc. Att'ys 23, § 29(a)(4); the attorney was suspended for 60 days with 12 months of conditional probation.
|
|||||
| Liggett v. Young, No. 38A02-0511-CV-1086,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, SECOND DISTRICT, July 24, 2006, Decided , July 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After entering partial summary judgment against a builder on his third-party complaint against homeowners, a trial court did not have to let the builder present new evidence, and the builder did not state sufficient evidence to show a homeowner violated Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.8(a), so a contract between the builder and the homeowners was not void.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
