 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Turner v. State, No. 48A02-0610-CR-924,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 3, 2007, Decided, August 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the doctrine of amelioration, defendant, convicted of nonsupport of a dependent child, should have been sentenced to Class D felony, rather than Class C felony, as he was sentenced after Ind. Code § 35-46-1-5(a) was amended to require arrearage of more than $ 15,000 for Class C felony and, inter alia, new statute contained no saving clause.
|
|||||
| Kessel v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co., No. 02A03-0607-CV-307,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 6, 2007, Decided, August 6, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A homeowners' insurance contract was not ambiguous because it was not susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation. Although the homeowners did not expressly invite an injured customer of their lessor, who was bitten by their dog, onto their property, they implicitly did when they leased the barn to the lessor run the stables from it.
|
|||||
| Scott v. State, No. 49A04-0701-CR-33,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 6, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported a theft conviction when a witness was 80 percent sure that defendant was the man she saw take ribs from a restaurant refrigerator, ribs were missing, defendant admitted that he had been at the restaurant and drove a car similar to that seen by the witness, and defendant was familiar with the restaurant's operation.
|
|||||
| In re Paternity of C.M.R., No. 25A05-0612-JV-732,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 7, 2007, Decided, August 7, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because it did not appear that necessary parties had been joined in a paternity action, a genetic testing order under Ind. Code § 31-14-6-1 was vacated. Neither the child's mother, the alleged father's estate, nor the persons on whom testing was ordered were parties, and it appeared that the father's other children were necessary parties as well.
|
|||||
| Moore v. State, No. 49A04-0702-PC-89,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 7, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
