 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Dedek v. Dedek, No. 53A01-0512-CV-548,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, FIRST DISTRICT, August 3, 2006, Decided , August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred by applying direct payments the father made to the mother to educational expenses rather than to his child support arrearage because there was no evidence concerning his alleged arrearage for educational expenses.
|
|||||
| Rolland v. State, No. 49A02-0508-CR-712,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, SECOND DISTRICT, August 3, 2006, Decided , August 3, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sufficient evidence supported defendant's convictions of theft and of fraud on a financial institution. Fraudulent checks drawn on an account of defendant' landlady were made payable to someone of defendant's name and deposited into an account in defendant's name, and defendant had left his room after the fraudulent activity was discovered.
|
|||||
| Combs v. State, No. 67A05-0511-CR-652,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, FIFTH DISTRICT, August 4, 2006, Decided , August 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence obtained during warrantless vehicle search was admissible where deputy had reasonable suspicion to briefly detain defendant to investigate an alleged theft of gas from the fire department and subsequent vehicle search was supported by deputies' belief, based on canine alert and observation of defendant, vehicle contained contraband.
|
|||||
| Mills v. Berrios, No. 49A05-0509-CV-524,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, FIFTH DISTRICT, August 4, 2006, Decided , August 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Fact that medical records expert relied on in providing opinion in medical malpractice case were not attached to or designated in his counter-affidavit to motion for summary judgment did not render the affidavit insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact as the information relied upon complied with the requirements of Ind. Evid. R. 703.
|
|||||
| S.E. Johnson Cos. v. N. Ind. Pub. Serv. Co., CAUSE NO. 90A05-0512-CV-738,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 4, 2006, Decided , August 4, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Young, No. 18A02-0502-CV-150,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, SECOND DISTRICT, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After an estate and an insured settled a wrongful death suit following judgment, it was error to allow the insurer to intervene under Ind. R. Trial P. 24(A)(2). Because the insurer was contesting coverage at the same time it filed its motion to intervene, its interest in the subject matter was contingent and not direct for purposes of the rule.
|
|||||
| Friedline v. Thomalla, No. 71A05-0602-CV-91,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, FIFTH DISTRICT, August 7, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While title to a trust corpus was transferred to a land trust that owed a judgment debt, it appeared that a garnishee retained true ownership of the property. Accordingly, the garnishee possessed nonexempt property and obligations subject to proceedings supplemental to execution pursuant to Ind. R. Trial P. 69(E).
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
