|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
Indiana - August 9 - August 14, 2007
|
| |
Christopher R. Brown, DDS, Inc. v. Decatur County Mem. Hosp., No. 93A02-0703-EX-236,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 9, 2007, Decided, August 9, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: A dental office that provided medical services to an employee in a worker's compensation case was not entitled to prejudgment interest after it was belatedly paid for its services. There was no provision for such interest in the Worker's Compensation Act, and the court could not read such a provision into the Act.
|
|
| |
Gray v. State, No. 49A04-0609-CR-518,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 10, 2007, Decided, August 10, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The trial court did not err under Ind. R.P. Post-Conviction Remedies 1, § 10(b) in imposing consecutive sentences. "More severe penalty" in the rule referred to the aggregate sentence, not its component parts, and the sentence here was five years less than the sentence imposed following defendant's first trial.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Carlock, Supreme Court Cause No. 30S00-0706-DI-258,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, August 13, 2007, Decided, August 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Attorney was suspended pendente lite from the practice of law in Indiana under Ind. R. Admis. Bar & Disc. Att'ys 23(11.1)(a) as he had been found guilty of perjury and forgery, which were both felonies. His Affidavit of Resignation did not comply with the requirements of Rule 23(17)(a), and was rejected.
|
|
| |
|
| |
In re Hurst, Supreme Court Cause No. 48S00-0605-DI-162,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, August 13, 2007, Decided, August 13, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: When an attorney violated Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b) by assaulting his wife, an act for which he took responsibility by pleading guilty and by consenting to discipline, he was publicly reprimanded, as he was no longer practicing law and a suspension would be of no practical effect.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Johnson v. Patriotic Fireworks, Inc., No. 49A02-0608-CV-632,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 14, 2007, Decided, August 14, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over an action in which fireworks wholesalers challenged the Fire Marshall's determination that under Ind. Code § 22-11-14-5, they had to obtain separate certificates of compliance for each location in which they operated. The wholesalers had not pursued administrative remedies before filing suit.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|