 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bay v. Pulliam, No. 49A05-0612-CV-704,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 28, 2007, Decided, August 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as clients' attorney did not have actual authority to settle case. Even though attorney was authorized to enter into settlement negotiations with driver's insurer, and clients knew negotiations were in progress, wife told attorney that she needed to discuss offer with husband. After those discussions, offer was rejected.
|
|||||
| Holland v. Rizzo, No. 49A05-0612-CV-697,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 28, 2007, Decided, August 28, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An inmate who was serving two life sentences for murder, one imposed in Kentucky and the other in Indiana, was not eligible for parole consideration under Ind. Code § 11-13-3-2. The statute unambiguously stated that a person sentenced to more than one life term was not eligible for parole; it did not limit its provisions to Indiana convictions.
|
|||||
| James v. State, No. 62A01-0702-CR-90,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When the original charges against defendant were dismissed and a different charge was filed based on the same conduct as the original charges, defendant was entitled to credit for his pretrial incarceration on the original charges, as he was not being given credit for a wholly unrelated offense.
|
|||||
| Marion Cmty. Sch. Corp. v. Marion Teachers Ass'n, CAUSE NO. 27A02-0609-CV-812,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, August 30, 2007, Decided, August 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
