 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adams v. Adams, No. 09A02-0701-CV 113,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When a father seeking to modify child support argued that the trial court had deviated from the Child Support Guidelines and imputed income to him, remand was required. Under Ind. Child Support Rule 3, if a trial court concluded that a particular amount reached by application of the Guidelines would be unjust, it had to enter written findings.
|
|||||
| Bumbalough v. State, No. 18A02-0701-CR-59,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment was reversed as defendant's right to due process in probation revocation proceeding was violated as defendant watched videotape that informed him of his rights, including his right to counsel, but record was silent as to whether trial court determined that defendant's waiver of right to counsel was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent.
|
|||||
| Charles G. Parsons v. Ind., 88A01-0606-CR-259,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Dorman v. Osmose, Inc., No. 53A04-0607-CV-374,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly declined to release a juror in a contractor's negligence action, because while the juror was initially upset about the income he would lose during the trial, the juror's employer agreed to pay the juror for the lost time, and the juror stated that he could keep an open mind about the evidence.
|
|||||
| Estate of Garey v. Geswein, 31A04-0610-CV-565,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re C.W. & S.R. v. Marion Co. Dep't of Child Servs., 49A04-0701-JV-51,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Ind. v. Lewis, 89A01-0611-CR-508,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| N. Side Serv. Ctr. v. Kulwin, 49A02-0609-CV-792,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Stafford v. Ind., 49A02-0611-CR-1011,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 25, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| Copyright© 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
