 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Helms v. Carmel High Sch. Voc. Bldg. Trades Corp., No. 29S04-0609-CV-341,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, September 27, 2006, Decided , September 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was no contractual or legal duty imposed on a general contractor in a building permit to construct a project in compliance with applicable law, the principal had no contractual or legal obligation to an employee of an independent contractor.
|
|||||
| In re Brown, Case No. 05S00-0601-DI-16,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, September 27, 2006, Decided , September 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney, who was appointed as a public defender to handle an appeal, was suspended for 60 days after he solicited fees from the client to handle his appeal and was also paid by the county for his work, a fact that he denied before the disciplinary commission; attorney's conduct violated, inter alia, Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.5(a) (reasonable fees).
|
|||||
| In re Magley, Case No. 85S00-0510-DI-494,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, September 27, 2006, Decided , September 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney was suspended for six months after pleading guilty to reckless driving in 2001, a conviction he did not report to the disciplinary commission, and pleading guilty to operating a vehicle while intoxicated in 2005; his conduct constituted violations of Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b), (d), and Ind. R. Admis. & Disc. Att'ys 23, § 11.1(a)(2).
|
|||||
| In re Webb, Case No. 48S00-0502-DI-54,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, September 28, 2006, Decided , September 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because an attorney, inter alia, did not keep a client's funds separate, did not keep the client informed about the status of a case, and misstated facts to the tribunal, the attorney violated Ind. R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a), 8.1(a), 8.4(b), (c), and 1.4(b); consequently, the attorney was suspended respondent from the practice of law for 12 months.
|
|||||
| Price v. Vill. Green Apts., No. 82A01-0510-CV-461,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, September 28, 2006, Decided , September 28, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Lessor was not entitled to unpaid rent or other damages because lessor did not comply with Ind. Code Ann. § 32-31-3-14 (2005), which required lessees be provided itemized list of damages claim for which security deposit was sought to be used within 45 days; fathers who rented apartment for sons were "tenants" and lessor had address for fathers.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
