 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Banks v. Brown, No. 77A04-0701-CV-48,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, October 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of an inmate's claim for costs against the State in his suit seeking damages for the failure to include a book of stamps in his commissary order was proper because costs were punitive in nature, and Ind. Code § 34-13-3-4(b) prohibited awards of punitive damages against the State.
|
|||||
| Kline v. State, No. 35A04-0612-CR-736,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, October 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant should have been sentenced according to terms of his first plea agreement because the trial court said it was taking the agreement under advisement, accepted defendant's guilty plea and entered convictions on all 22 counts. Defendant's motion to enter a guilty plea incorporated the agreement, and was conditioned on that agreement.
|
|||||
| Smith & Wesson Corp. v. City of Gary, No. 45A05-0612-CV-754,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, October 29, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the city's nuisance complaint and the Indiana Supreme Court's opinion indicated that the city alleged that the manufacturers violated a state or federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product, the city's action was not barred by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, 15 U.S.C.S. §§ 7901-7903.
|
|||||
| Anglemyer v. State, No. 43S05-0606-CR-230,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, October 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While trial court's failure to consider guilty plea as mitigating factor could be raised on appeal even if defendant did not raise it at the sentencing hearing, defendant's guilty plea was not a significant mitigating factor as he received a substantial benefit from it, and it did not demonstrate defendant's acceptance of responsibility.
|
|||||
| Hale v. State, No. 43A05-0611-CR-647,
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, October 30, 2007, Decided, October 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's felony drug conviction and 50-year sentence were affirmed; no mistrial was required as striking improper testimony was sufficient cure, evidence that in a controlled buy defendant provided informant with over four grams of cocaine was sufficient to convict, and given defendant's criminal history, sentence was appropriate.
|
|||||
| In re Harper, Supreme Court Cause No. 49S00-0606-DI-225,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, October 30, 2007, Decided, October 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Richardson, Supreme Court Cause No. 49S00-0607-DI-271,
SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, October 30, 2007, Decided, October 30, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
