Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free! Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free! While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
	State Courts - Indiana - November 17, 2006
	Johnson v. Dawson, No. 79A04-0601-CV-8, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, November 17, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because parties intended to restrict the number of cars for which garages were built and the most reasonable interpretation of a restrictive covenant was that the subdivision landowners were limited to garage space of not more than three cars per lot, the injunction as to building a separate garage was proper. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Puckett v. Jones (In re J.A.P.), No. 43A03-0604-JV-169, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, November 17, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because a mother did not intentionally withhold information about a child's father, the entry of a nunc pro tunc order dismissing the paternity petition was improper, and the court erred in failing to order retroactive child support to the date the petition was filed, the matter was remanded to recalculate the amount of retroactive child support. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Jakupko, No. 29A02-0603-CV-207, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, November 17, 2006, Decided View this case - free   Overview: Because a family's negligent infliction of emotional distress claims accompanied by physical manifestations were bodily injuries sustained in the same automobile accident, UIM coverage for the accident was subject only to the policy's "Each Accident" limit of liability. Thus, the family was entitled to $ 300,000 under the policy. Search Cases for Free | Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers | Case Summary Email Service - 50% off
	Back to Top
	www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us   Copyright© 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.