LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Indiana - December 12 - December 13, 2006

  
Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. Moriarty, No. 43A03-0605-CV-213, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Client's negligence action was barred by limitations period contained in Accountancy Act of 2001, Ind. Code § 25-2.1-1-1 et seq., as, inter alia, client's cause resulted from agreement to provide professional services, discovery of negligence occurred almost two years before action was filed, and continuous representation doctrine was inapplicable.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Briles v. Wausau Ins. Cos., No. 10A04-0605-CV-244, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Insurance company had no duty to provide coverage for traffic accident because, at time of the accident, insured's employee was violating express restrictions on the use of the van involved in the accident. The employee was aware of restriction on van's use, as he had requested, and was denied, permission from his supervisor to take the trip.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Daugherty v. Robinson Farms, Inc., No. 42A04-0603-CV-159, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Pursuant to Ind. R. Trial P. 38(B), a trial court had discretion to allow a belated demand for a jury trial, but only if the parties had entered into a written agreement to a trial by jury. Because the parties did not enter into such a written agreement, the trial court properly reversed its grant of a farmer's belated jury trial demand.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Heidbreder, Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, No. 45A03-0603-CV-136, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because Ind. Code § 36-7-4-918.6 applied to municipalities within the counties to which it applied, the trial court erred when it found that the statute did not apply a municipality located within Lake County. Since the city council voted within ninety days after the Board of Zoning Appeals made its recommendation, the special permit was granted.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ledden v. Kuzma, No. 45A04-0604-CV-192, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Award of attorney fees pursuant to Ind. R. Trial P. 37 based on an owner's opposition to plaintiffs' motion for a protective order barring the owner's expert from attending a deposition was improper because plaintiffs' motion was unsupported by affidavits or other evidence. The owner was substantially justified in opposing plaintiffs' motion.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Robinson v. Robinson, No. 06A01-0510-CV-458, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's order directing husband to tender an amended QDRO providing that husband's monthly pension benefit should not have been reduced by more than $ 1423 and that the wife was to receive the resulting benefit there from was an improper modification of the parties' settlement agreement and the trial court's final dissolution decree.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Van Wieren v. Van Wieren, No. 45A05-0603-CV-112, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 12, 2006, Decided , December 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: As each parent attempted to alienate their children from the other, an award of sole custody to either would have awarded that parent for disrespectful and distasteful behavior; therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion under Ind. Code § 31-17-2-21 in maintaining split physical custody arrangement, with father as sole legal custodian.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Abney v. State, No. 49A02-0603-CR-267, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 13, 2006, Decided , December 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of operating a vehicle while intoxicated causing death as a Class B felony, a violation of Ind. Code § 9-30-5-5, because the evidence of blood, skin, and hair on the front of his car and his car's deployed airbag was sufficient to allow a jury to determine that he had struck and killed a bicyclist.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Creekmore v. State, No. 43A03-0509-CR-466, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 13, 2006, Decided , December 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although a prosecutor's collection fee was not authorized under Ind. Code Ann. § 33-37-4-1 for check deception in violation of Ind. Code Ann. § 35-43-5-5, a collection fee might be imposed where it was authorized by the Indiana Home Rule statute, Ind. Code Ann. § 36-1-3-2, and a valid county ordinance authorizing the collection fee.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Holcomb v. Walter's Dimmick Petroleum, Inc., No. 76S04-0604-CV-138, SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, December 13, 2006, Decided , December 13, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an action for false arrest and defamation, a gas station clerk and owner were entitled to qualified privilege for the clerk's statements to police that someone operating a specifically identified vehicle had driven off without paying for his gasoline because no evidence existed that the clerk's statements were made without belief in their truth.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.