LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - Indiana - December 14 - December 20, 2006

  
Burnside v. State, No. 71A04-0605-PC-264, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 14, 2006, Decided , December 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellate counsel for a prisoner convicted of murder provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to raise the issue of a jury instruction that intermingled the prisoner's self-defense and reckless homicide theories such that the jury could not consider reckless homicide without first finding self-defense pursuant to Ind. Code § 35-41-3-2.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
J.J. v. State, No. 48A04-0510-PC-572, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 14, 2006, Decided , December 14, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Prisoner received ineffective assistance of counsel at his burglary and theft trial when his counsel did not inform the jury that the prisoner's friend, who testified against him, had been granted use immunity; the prisoner was prejudiced because the circumstantial evidence allowed a finding of nonguilt and his friend's credibility was important.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Mallard's Pointe Condo. Ass'n v. L&L Investors Group, LLC, No. 64A04-0604-CV-176, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 15, 2006, Decided , December 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: It was just to enter default judgment against defendant under Ind. R. Trial P. 37 without a hearing. It had more than five months' notice of the materials it needed to provide and had been warned by the trial court that failure to comply with its order would result in a default judgment; it had not mentioned any problems or requested an extension.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Timberlake v. State, Supreme Court Cause No. 49S00-0606-SD-235, SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, December 15, 2006, Decided , December 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Court did not allow petitioner, who had been sentenced to death, to present a successive post-conviction petition under Ind. R.P. Post-Conviction Remedies 1, § 12. He had not shown a reasonable possibility of establishing that he was insane under the standard that he be unaware of the punishment he was about to suffer and why he was to suffer it.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Friend v. State, No. 84A04-0512-CR-753, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 18, 2006, Decided , December 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Alleged consent to search was not voluntary where defendant was in custody when asked to consent but was not informed of his right to counsel before his consent was obtained. Inventory exception was inapplicable where trooper admitted he was not conducting an inventory search but was searching for contraband when he discovered the methamphetamine.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Higgason v. Buss, No. 46A04-0603-CV-171, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 19, 2006, Decided , December 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Judicial review of prison disciplinary decisions was precluded. Contrary to an inmate's argument, nothing in the text of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.S. § 12101, et seq., or the case law interpreting conferred subject matter jurisdiction on the trial court to review his disciplinary proceeding.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Newman, No. 48S00-0607-JD-274, SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA, December 19, 2006, Decided , December 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Judge was publicly reprimanded for misconduct which violated, inter alia, Ind. Code Jud. Conduct Canon 1A. Judge failed to order release of a criminal defendant from DOC after his probation revocation was reversed on appeal. As a result, the defendant unnecessarily spent over one year incarcerated with DOC and one year on supervised parole.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Clancy v. Goad, No. 45A03-0511-CV-00569, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 20, 2006, Decided , December 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In this negligence action, the jury's awards for damages were reasonable in light of the evidence presented at trial; the record was replete with evidence of devastating injuries, permanent disabilities, and continuing pain and suffering on the part of a woman who once enjoyed an active and athletic lifestyle.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Quinn v. Threlkel, No. 55A01-0607-CV-314, COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA, December 20, 2006, Decided , December 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an action for modification of child support and for payment of college expenses, the case was remanded for further consideration of the post-secondary education expense order; the trial court neither obtained and adopted a party's verified post-secondary education expense worksheet, nor did it make findings paralleling the worksheet.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.