 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wells v. Lynch, No. 6-427 / 05-1260,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment of the district court was reversed and the case was remanded because the district court erred in treating plaintiff's law action for breach of contract and negligent misrepresentation as an equity action for rescission of a contract and restitution.
|
|||||
| Wheeler v. Strunk, No. 6-829 / 05-2089,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was affirmed because defendants were entitled to summary judgment based on the doctrine of sudden emergency, when there was no genuine issue of material fact present as to whether the husband suffered a heart attack and whether the heart attack caused the automobile accident.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, No. 6-570 / 05-1093,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a postconviction case involving first-degree murder under Iowa Code § 707.2 and first-degree robbery, an inmate failed to show that he received ineffective assistance of counsel based on a failure to object to the jury instructions because the State was not required to specify in the information what theories it was proceeding.
|
|||||
| Wityk v. Patterson, No. 6-881 / 06-1056,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 18, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The placement of physical care of the parties' daughter with the mother was proper because the physical care arrangement was in the child's best interests under Iowa Code § 598.41(3). The parties lived too far apart to make joint physical care a viable option and the mother had been the child's primary caregiver.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
