 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Wasker v. McDonald (In re Estate of Williams), No. 5-532 / 04-1521,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment was properly awarded to estate in claimants' suit to recover their investments in business that they owned with testator because claims were barred by Iowa Code § 633.410; claimants were not constitutionally entitled to mailed notice because estate acquired knowledge of their claims after four-month period in § 633.410 had elapsed.
|
|||||
| Welcher v. Am. Ordnance,L.L.C., No. 5-827 / 04-1045,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the employee's claims under Iowa Code § 730.5 was affirmed because 48 C.F.R. § 252.223-7004 clearly vested the employer with broad discretion in determining which employees were in sensitive positions, and such a designation was appropriately applied to the employee, as he had access to and occasionally handled explosive compounds.
|
|||||
| Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Robex, Inc., No. 5-933 / 04-1097,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Court did not err in granting summary judgment to bank in its suit against guarantor of a promissory note for judgment on note; guarantor could not rely on decision in a companion case as it was on appeal and thus not a final decision and general denial in answer and accompanying affidavit were insufficient to raise genuine issue of material fact.
|
|||||
| Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Robex, Inc., No. 5-824 / 04-0292,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in favor of the bank in its replevin action was affirmed because the description of collateral in the security agreement and financing statement sufficiently described the property by type so that a security interest attached, when the security agreement described the collateral as the property that the company "owned."
|
|||||
| Winnebago Indus. v. Haverly, No. 5-872 / 05-0493,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employer was not precluded from litigating issue of liability in proceeding where it had admitted liability in alternate medical care proceeding; employer did not deny responsibility to provide medical care for worker's back condition, but argued obligation did not arise out of new injury. Law of case and judicial estoppel did not bar litigation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
