 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Spiker v. Spiker, No. 147 / 04-1182,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District court was correct that res judicata did not bar a mother's petition to modify a grandparent visitation order because the unconstitutionality of Iowa Code § 598.35(1) (2001) was a substantial change in circumstances that justified terminating the order.
|
|||||
| State v. Allen, No. 137 / 04-1561,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, January 20, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because a correctional facility was not a "detention facility" under Iowa Code § 719.8 (2003), there was no factual basis supporting defendant's guilty plea to introducing a controlled substance into a detention facility and because counsel was ineffective for not challenging plea for lack of a factual basis, defendant's conviction was reversed.
|
|||||
| Comes v. Microsoft Corp., No. 145 / 05-0097,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding that collateral estoppel would apply to findings of fact arising from a prior federal antitrust litigation was reversed and remanded because the district court's application of the "necessary and essential" requirement of collateral estoppel was too broad.
|
|||||
| Dickens v. Associated Anesthesiologists, P.C., No. 143 / 04-0973,
SUPREME COURT OF IOWA, January 27, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of the medical negligence action was reversed because dismissal against the anesthesiologist and nurse for lack of jurisdiction was not res judicata and was not the type of dismissal that would preclude the claimant from proceeding on his claims against the company on a theory of respondeat superior.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
