 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| State v. Zuke, No. 6-008 / 05-0091,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant was convicted of Iowa Code §§ 709.1 and 709.4 third degree sexual abuse, but admission of evidence regarding his possession of sexual devices, pornographic videos, and guns was prejudicial; inter alia, evidence seized in 2003 was irrelevant to issues of abuse occurring between 1991 and 1997, and evidence of his guilt was not overwhelming.
|
|||||
| TMC Transp. v. Davidson, No. 5-932 / 04-1044,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In workers' compensation matter, intermediate appellate court declined to find that workers' compensation commissioner had subject matter jurisdiction because supreme court characterized Iowa Code § 85.71 as a circumscription of commissioner's subject matter jurisdiction; moreover, worker had failed to show a prima facie case for jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Warner v. Moore, No. 5-960 / 05-0403,
COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA, February 15, 2006, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in excluding evidence of the motorist's mental pain and suffering that arose from the loss of income resulting from the car accident because it was not a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the accident, and there was no prejudice where the jury found that the motorist had not suffered any compensable loss of income.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
